2026: FOUNDATIONS AND HORIZONS

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2026

Introduction: Welcome to our special New Year's Edition 2026! To start this year under the sign of foundations and horizons, here is the noteworthy news for this year.

We look back on an eventful year. We, Ron’s Org Grenchen, had a very good year: we were very busy and had a solid inflow.

Foundations and Horizons

Building the House

All of us, the entire staff, are very satisfied with Ron’s Org and its development so far.

For this reason, I decided some time ago to continue building. This is a large project, consisting of thousands of small and large cycles. At present, we are in the planning phase: the plans are being developed, and various options are being discussed.

The intention and the plan are to provide Scientology with a secure platform for the future. I am able to take this step because I am supported worldwide – not just by Ron’s Org Grenchen. I receive support from many dedicated Scientologists. This gives me the strength and energy to take on this project and assume responsibility for it.

Ron’s Org Grenchen will provide the next generation with a solid foundation for the future. It offers youth space and opportunity to realize Ron’s postulate. As a result, the coming generation can devote themselves even more fully to Doingness and the application of Scientology.

Reincarnation

In my writings throughout the year, I have repeatedly emphasized the necessity of Scientology. In a single sentence, it’s about the evolution of the thetan in a human body.

From both direct and indirect observation, I can see how obviously cleared or partially cleared and trained thetans reincarnate. However, children do not come to me with a radiant smile and say:

“Hello Max! Here I am again. Don’t you remember? In my last life my name was … I’m back.” No – that’s not how it works.

A new life is a new opportunity.

They return with all the abilities they have acquired. Yet the last life is finished and part of history. The higher the tone level and the more As-Isness is achieved, the more it is truly gone – forgotten. Forgotten as a capability, as Ron so aptly describes in the book Straightwire – A Manual of Operation (1 July 1955.) And yet, it is there when it is needed.

It is indeed as Buddha describes: reincarnation should not be seen as a string of pearls, where each pearl is a life and the thread represents the spiritual being. Rather, it is more like stacked cubes – not truly connected.

The beautiful thing, however, is that one carries over their abilities and their (high) tone. One does not start from zero – not in any case.

Evolution of Thetans

We are working on our own evolution and that of our friends. We carry responsibility – for ourselves, for our friends, and also for strangers. Life brings little joy without high-tone friends.

This is my main motivation, and that of my staff – and probably yours as well: to advance thetans, making them more capable and higher in tone.

Yet this very topic is neglected or even actively suppressed in our society. And it’s not just about Russia – it affects all nations, some more, some less. I have seen enough and also have a good understanding of history. The suppression of knowledge, abilities, and reincarnation has a long history. From the very beginning, governments viewed Scientology as a thorn in their side.

The understanding of the physical universe, its know-how, AI, and what can be achieved with them is progressing at breathtaking speed.

Psychopaths organize wars, carried out by uninformed Homo sapiens. Knowledgeable people cannot be so easily used for visible or invisible wars.

We – Ron’s Org Grenchen and other Ron’s Orgs – work hard to clear people. We have ensured that the tech is available. As I wrote a few weeks ago, we possess all editions: the correct ones as well as the altered and squirreled versions — complete. Our classrooms ensure that students work with the correct materials.

The point I want to make is this: it is everyone’s responsibility to clear their friends and to bring them into Ron’s Org. If you don’t do it – who will?

Disseminating people does not mean convincing them of Scientology. From experience, I know that a fixed idea can only be recognized by the person themselves. Neither guns nor torture can achieve this – nor can well-chosen words. Only the person can recognize it.

A person’s thoughts always correspond to their position on the tone scale. Our goal is high-tone people.

That is why Scientology does not moralize. It is open to all religions and precisely for that reason is non-political.

Unfortunately, people have a strong tendency to use any means – including Scientology – to support their own agenda. This behavior is humanly understandable but has no place in Scientology.

Our friendship is not based on group pressure, financial alignment, or emotional agreement. We respect a thetan as what they truly are: themselves.

FSM Meetings

A few months ago, we gave the FSM meeting a new focus. It’s not about big words, but about training communication. The goal is to conduct effective communication. Ultimately, it’s always about truly understanding the other person.

We don’t sell Scientology – we understand people. Only genuine understanding helps someone progress and can lead them to understanding. Or, as Ron puts it: only a thetan can clear a thetan. Life needs life.

For this, I need you. The most effective advertising for Scientology is a cleared thetan. Through understanding, one thetan can reach another.

New: Online Technical and Administrative Dictionary

We are pleased to offer you the opportunity to find all the words – both technical and administrative – online in English, German, French, and Russian.

Happy New Year 2026!

Max and the entire staff of Ron’s Org Grenchen

PS: Here below, are a few more great words from Ron. To better understand Ron, you can replace the expression “Bengal tiger” with any crazy and/or fixed idea.

---

Bengal Tigers

Excerpt form the lecture Assessment, given on the 22 April 1959 by L. Ron Hubbard

To listen and read the full lecture, click on this link.

It may be in your mind when you first confront your first raving hydrophobic Homo sap, that I have omitted something in these lectures, because, obviously, something else is wrong with this man.

Now, our creature in this particular event is simply other-determined and he's being other-determined by something of great significance and particulate; which gives us an apparent case type. Follow that, see? It's what's determining this fellow and its characteristics that make him behave in the fashion he is behaving in. And that's it.

The thing you must keep your eye on in spite of the vast, all-absorbing interest of these particularities that's causing him to be hydrophobic is the fact that it's other-determined. The degree that it is other-determined is established by the affinity, the communication and the reality of the pc.

Now, if this fellow, as he jumps around and froths at the mouth, keeps telling us that the place is full of Bengal tigers, we have connected at once with an unreality, from our point of view, at least. We certainly don't share this. We look all around and we don't even see a pelt. But he tells us that the place is full of Bengal tigers. All right, that's his reality.

But complacently, that doesn't mean that it is a desirable reality. Just because it's his reality doesn't mean it's desirable nor does it mean that this individual is safe to have around. Nor does it mean that it's an optimum solution just to go along with holy acceptance of everything that we see and say, "It's all to the best in this best of all possible worlds to have this individ­ual around that thinks that everything's full of Bengal tigers."

First mistake you could make, you see, is not realize that this person's real­ity is a room full of Bengal tigers. See? We have to just recognize that.

Now, the mistake that is commonly made is the individual says, "Well, all right, it's his reality and he's entitled to it." Now, why does this individual who says, "Well, that's his reality and he's entitled to it," why does this indi­vidual have such an attitude? That's an interesting one too, you see. That is just a total individuation from the other fellow's privacy. You see? That's a declaration on the part of the observer that he has no share in life. See, he's just an observer and you'll very often find this attitude and it's most startling.

It's an old truism that a person who is batty is usually surrounded to some degree by batty people. You go into a family to process Aunt Zed and you find out that she may be strictly fruitcake, but the people who are demanding that she be straightened out are the last people in the world to assist you to straighten her out. And after you've been hard at work straight­ening out Aunt Zed, why, they get much harder at work in unison to unstraighten her. You get the idea? You're just getting not only not­-cooperation but you're getting resistance because actually it tends to be a psycho environment. And this person is inhabiting this psycho environment. What you're looking at then is an environment, a very poor reality, anyway.

Now, to say that you have no share in this or to say you have no responsibil­ity for it or to say that it doesn't influence you in any way and so forth is simply taking an extreme view of isolationism, an extreme view of detachment.

Irresponsibility is the underscored word which matches up such an attitude.

Inability to observe is the phrase that describes the first symptom. You just can't believe that this individual thinks the room is full of Bengal tigers. Well, that's just an inability to observe, that's all. It isn't necessary that you see the Bengal tigers, but it's sure necessary to observe that this individual believes they're there.

Don't go around saying, "Well it's impossible that the room is full of Bengal tigers so, therefore, it's utterly impossible that this individual thinks so." Don't go protesting against that. He thinks so.

Don't say, "Well, the reality is so outrageous that nobody can accept it nobody could believe it, nobody could have anything to do with it and there­fore it doesn't exist." Because that way you'll wind a cropper every time as an auditor. You must realize that this character thinks the room is full of Bengal tigers! See, that's your observation.

Well, it's not going to kill you to observe it. It's quite the contrary. You only get into trouble as an auditor when you never observe this.

This individual's busy crawling walls and diving through skylights and fighting windmills of one character or another, and you say, "Well, it's not real, none of these things are motivated so therefore, he isn't doing these things." You know? "And we just won't observe that. And, actually, what's necessary here is that we do something else here. Let's see, now, the best thing to do – I wonder what would keep him quiet?" You get the idea? Just wrong attitude.

Look at him. Realize that this is what he's doing. This is what he believes. Now, we're in a position to do something about it.

Now, obsessively, it is not absolutely vital and necessary that you do something about everything that you see – otherwise you would be too busy and you wouldn't get very much done. But if you're supposed to do something about this and you're the person that's going to do something about it, then for heaven's sakes, do something about it. You see?

To take a detached attitude, however, toward all people alive and say, "Well that's just so – that's the way life is and …" That's just an irresponsi­bility.

Now, an obsessive responsibility whereby you've got to go around and smash out all these bad ideas and you've got to all do it at once, and you've got to fight these ideas at once, is almost as batty as not fighting them at all.

There is a scale, you might say, between irresponsibility – bad, total responsibility – bad. Somewhere in the middle ground, why, there's a respon­sibility and an irresponsibility sort of mixed up. Get the idea? That is a fairly decent attitude.

L. Ron Hubbard